Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a238321c0ccafad4

Jump to content

Talk:Digital Transmission Content Protection

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Overand

Talk:Digital Transmission Content Protection

[edit]
  1. DTCP is NOT a DRM, but a link protection! This mistake is often written, but false.  Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.6.224.137 (talk) 08:31, 2 April 2010‎
  2. I know the term "Digital Rights Management" is nebulous, but I fail to see the distinction. DVD encryption can also be considered "Link protection," but we simply call it DRM, or even "Copy protection." 208.99.137.71 (talk) 17:32, 28 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Metadiscussion - on authors?

[edit]
  1. "Editor's Note" - ha! I'd like to note that comment #1 up there was posted from an IP Address belonging to "VIAACCESS SA," a firm involved in the development of DRM. (Or perhaps "Link Protection?") See Viaccess, or the site at viaacess.com. The user's contributions are certainly interesting. The IP's reverse DNS is actually chronos.viaccess.com, and given it's from an organization, I'm going to guess that it's an outbound NAT device, so these contributions may be from multiple employees. My thought/question: does an employee of a DRM company making changes to pages about DRM constitute an expert contribution? Conflict of interest? I'm sure there's a policy on it somewhere. Only two such edits seem to be conflict-y, but they're definitely conflict-y. Overand (talk) 16:07, 20 May 2016 (UTC)Reply