Talk:Digital Markets Act
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Digital Markets Act article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
"Act"
[edit]The EU doesn't do "Acts". That term is only used for the legislative instruments of (some) member state governments. EU law is in the form of Directives and Regulations. This is a proposed regulation. Hairy Dude (talk) 14:09, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
- Nevertheless both the Council and Parliament have taken to calling it the Digital Markets Act per the Commission, and so has everyone else, so WP:COMMONNAME is fitting. The text itself, after referring to the "the draft legislative act", indeed goes on to adopt "this regulation" and there's nary a mention of any Digital Markets Act. Which is reflected in the lede. int21h (talk · contribs · email) 01:08, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
Signature
[edit]I've seen people slow walking it before, but both Parliament and Council decided this by formal vote between 5 and 18 July (4 years ago). When is the regulation going to be signed and sent to the Publications Office? int21h (talk · contribs · email) 01:22, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- The Digital Services Act's article could also use some help! James Tamim (talk) 22:30, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
New gatekeepers
[edit]The European Comission has added Booking.com as a gatekeeper and started investigating X.com (https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_24_2561). The article should be updated to reflect that. They have also designated Apple in the context of iPadOS as a gatekeeper (https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_24_2363).
2407:7000:9BF6:3903:C69:E07F:A01A:BA92 (talk) 10:12, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Para in 4.3 "Sectors concerned (Core Platforms Services)" is tautological
[edit]My bolds:
"On February 13, 2024, the European Commission announced their decision that Bing, Edge, Microsoft Advertising and iMessage don't qualify as gatekeeper services. […] Despite the lack of detail provided by the European Commission on their decision, multiple outlets speculated that the decision was based on the services not meeting the threshold necessary to be classified as a gatekeeper service."
It seems to me "don't qualify" and "not meeting the threshold necessary" are the same thing. Quilt Phase (talk) 23:40, 6 September 2024 (UTC)