Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2273b630ffb3e6e

Jump to content

Talk:Digital 3D

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Goldhunt in topic Article Not Sufficiently Referenced

First Paragraph

[edit]

The first paragraph of this article is completely and utterly nonsensical. 219.89.205.8 (talk) 05:32, 19 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Please contribute to this article

[edit]

user talk:Rubberdude2010 I started this article because some to some people digital 3D just meant RealD and that was it. There is more too it then that, almost 100% of the info on this article was contributed by me. It was originally a re-direct to Disney Digital 3D. A veteran contributor has suggested to me that this article have more up to date information. Anyone who wants to contribute to this page, I am saying the same thing to you. Be sure to do your research before you add to it. Plus I think it would also be appropriate that if anyone knows what XpanD 3D is, I think it needs it's own article.

I think the problem with this article is that it tries to define "Digital 3D" as a enclopedic term, whereas it's nothing more than a product brand-name ("RealD Digital 3D", "Disney Digital 3D".) The other thing is that the opening paragraph confuses stereoscopic projection (i.e. content delivery), with a Disney-biased interpretation which includes the backend 3D/cgi conversion process (i.e. content production.) Delivery/projection systems and production/post-production issues are really separate things, and should be kept separate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.41.58.51 (talk) 05:20, 10 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

The comment that polarised glasses were used in the 1950s heyday of 3D film is surely incorrect or at least inaccurate. Glasses with colour tinted lenses were in widespread use during this period. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mintymiller (talkcontribs) 05:47, 10 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Live-action...what?

[edit]

This sentence is in "Live-Action": Digital Cinema cameras are not really required for 3D but are the predominant medium 99% off what is photographed.

I'm not quite sure what that is supposed to be saying....maybe, "3D does not necessarily require the use of Digital Cinema cameras, but most 3D content is currently produce using them." Or something like that...the 99% figure certainly requires a citation.

Article Not Sufficiently Referenced

[edit]

This article is not sufficiently referenced throughout. For the most part, dates that films or technologies were introduced need to be referenced. Tagged with refimprove. Goldhunt (talk) 05:48, 19 August 2013 (UTC)Reply