Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This article is part of WikiProject Algae, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the photosynthetic organisms commonly called algae and related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AlgaeWikipedia:WikiProject AlgaeTemplate:WikiProject AlgaeAlgae
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Protista, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of protists and protistology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ProtistaWikipedia:WikiProject ProtistaTemplate:WikiProject ProtistaProtista
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marine life, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Marine lifeWikipedia:WikiProject Marine lifeTemplate:WikiProject Marine lifeMarine life
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change
Latest comment: 3 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion
@Epipelagic: According to WP:CLICKHERE, a caption should not tell the reader to "click 3 times to fully enlarge" an image. That instruction only applies to desktop browsing. A user accessing a printed or screenread copy of the article cannot click anything, and on mobile the second and third taps do not enlarge the image any further than the first, it requires pinch zooming instead. Belbury (talk) 11:02, 29 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
Then why can't Wikipedia's administration find the will to fix simple problems like this? The solution is straightforward: create a template that lets editors display different text on desktop, mobile, and printed versions. This image is genuinely remarkable — it lets viewers zoom in and study the structure of individual diatoms. Without the instruction, most of its value is wasted. The printed-version objection is nonsense. Anyone smart enough to use a mouse knows clicking doesn't work on paper. Wikipedia could easily strip out "click here" instructions for print copies, instead of inventing yet another bureaucratic rule. The project is heading for rapid collapse as AI advances. The administration shows zero interest in building useful tools for editors. Instead, they obsess over ideological crusades while allowing endless bureaucratic creep and petty tyranny. They’re burying the last constructive editors under mountains of pointless restrictions. Maybe it's time to give up. Wikipedia is steering itself straight into the trash bin of history. — Epipelagic (talk) 13:34, 29 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
If most of an image's value is wasted when a user doesn't think to (or is unable to) fully zoom in on it, it sounds like it might be better to crop that image to a particularly valuable section, or to display both the full image and a crop of it in the article. Making an article more accessible for print readers can help everyone. Belbury (talk) 13:57, 29 April 2026 (UTC)Reply