Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2498747db08e88e

Jump to content

Talk:Devious lick

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 3 months ago by EmsSV in topic Should we mention Angelic Yields?

Requested move 22 September 2021

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:46, 29 September 2021 (UTC)Reply


Devious licksDevious Licks – Licks should be capitalized because multiple RS cited in article capitalize both words. Iamreallygoodatcheckers (talk) 03:00, 22 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

@BarrelProof: Seconded - Per WP:COMMONNAME. 174.198.202.168 (talk) 12:28, 22 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose for all the reasons given above, and because 'devious lick' obviously isn't a proper noun and should not be capitalized. Just because a source employs bad grammar or has misspellings doesn't mean Wikipedia needs to follow suit. Joe (talk) 22:50, 24 September 2021 (UTC)Reply


The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

"Are" → "were"?

[edit]

Because the trend has been banned off the app, should the tense of the article be changed? —  Melofors  TC 01:03, 23 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Origin of the name

[edit]

Origin section doesn't mention how the trend got its' name - does anyone know? Oriiiiii (talk) 11:54, 25 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Oriiiiii: What do you mean? It says in the first sentence that the name originated from a caption in the first video. —  Melofors  TC 17:54, 25 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Aftermath?

[edit]

Devious licks recently gave way to a list of monthly TikTok "challenges" for the 2021–2022 academic year, which seems to be supported by a few reliable sources.[1][2][3][4][5] A notable challenge on the list, which is for this month (October), is the "slap a teacher challenge"; reliable sources for this "challenge" can be found with a quick, simple Google search. I'm thinking about adding an 'aftermath' section, but it seems like devious licks are still going on. Should I add it? Let me know. Thank you in advance for your inputs. L33tm4n (talk) 16:06, 10 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

I haven't received anything yet, so I'm going to be pinging other users for help. L33tm4n (talk) 21:53, 26 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

References

Covid context

[edit]

I'm on mobile, but I think it'd be helpful to note the timeline's relation to the Covid 19 pandemic. It seems that the challenge started as American students returned back from remote learning, which might be relevant. SheepTester (talk) 08:25, 26 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:36, 28 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Should we mention Angelic Yields?

[edit]

The opposite of devious licks
- EmsSV (talk) 23:36, 27 April 2026 (UTC)Reply