Talk:Development of Windows 95
Add topic | Text or other creative content from [nil ] was copied or moved into Development of Windows 95 with [permanent diff this edit]. The former page's [ history] now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 26 August 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was merge to Windows 95. |
This is a reference i used for the build numbers:
REMOVED, WP admins say that it is not a source.
As for the ones that "have no info", I got those versions and installed them on MS Virtual PC, without success.
Deletion
[edit]the only reason I can't find more info on windows chicago is because it's hard to find any info at all! own research, yes because there's hardly any info on win chicago at all. as for copyrighted information, the picture used was already in teh Windows 95 article. as for the text portion, i can't see how that would be copyrighted, all it is is describing waht each build is like a little bit. as for lack of sources, this brings us back to square one: it's hard to find any information on Windows Chicago! Linuxlove8088 (talk) 22:30, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
another ref?
[edit]http://toastytech.com/guis/indexwindows.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by Linuxlove8088 (talk • contribs) 00:18, 26 August 2009 (UTC)