Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22da1b65a0814c2

Jump to content

Talk:Detroit Seamount

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 3 years ago by 104.153.40.58 in topic Name

Age contradictions

[edit]

"Detroit Seamount, which was formed around 76 million years ago" in the introduction and "After its initial formation 51 million years ago" in Geology and "Analysis put the latest date of their formation at 60 million years ago, 6 million years into the seamount's life." in Mantle of sediment. 92.25.7.175 (talk) 03:24, 27 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Expanded

[edit]

Expanded a bit, but it's as far as it'll go. Correction:I've added it to my DYK quene, see this! ResMar 22:17, 3 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Mapping

[edit]

I created a "Mapping" section to tell the story of mapping the seamount in a coherent narrative, rather than interrupting the geological history of the seamount itself.--Wetman (talk) 22:24, 14 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Interesting research papers

[edit]

Located two research papers online that might be worth adding:

I don't have the knowledge-base to evaluate them properly so I'll leave them here for an interested party.

Graham1973 (talk) 02:25, 8 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Name

[edit]

"Detroit Seamount is one of the few seamounts to break the naming scheme of the Emperor seamounts, which are named mostly after emperors or empresses of the Kofun period of Japanese history. It is instead named after the light cruiser USS Detroit." Why? 104.153.40.58 (talk) 06:42, 11 December 2022 (UTC)Reply