Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a21bd4449f66a68e

Jump to content

Talk:Designer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Nigel Cross in topic Multiple issues

Getting a balance

[edit]

, trying to give a balanced and objective definition and explanation of what a designer is and does. There is quite a long list of 'examples', and I guess it could be expanded further - but would that really be helpful? I think it is not helpful to have a few examples presented in detail (Costume and Game, as we have now). We cannot have all the examples presented in that way. That should be left to the main articles about the professions. The 'See also' and 'Categories' are also not helpful as they are. Bristolian46 (talk) 17:00, 4 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

I propose to delete the paragraphs on Costume Designer and Game Designer, which are linked through the Examples list to their respective main articles. It doesn't make sense to have just these two given in detail. Bristolian46 (talk) 17:44, 10 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Neutral: It's probably a good idea to delete them or at least shorten them and include equally short examples of all the other designers listed. The only reason I can think of to keep them is because the article lacks content without them. It's pretty much a stub without the examples. Maybe a whole new structure is needed with common subtopics like history, modern uses, controversy , etc. Oicumayberight (talk) 18:50, 10 February 2008 (UTC)Reply


A graphic designer is what I would want to be. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.50.169.198 (talk) 17:03, 16 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

[1]

Multiple issues

[edit]

This article as it stands hardly justifies being in Wikipedia at all. It is primarily a simple, uninformative essay, with basic errors in spelling and grammar, just one inappropriate citation, and a long list. Nigel Cross (talk) 09:38, 23 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

  1. Cite error: The named reference undefined was invoked but never defined (see the help page).