Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a21ffb575a39ee28

Jump to content

Talk:Denmark

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 2 months ago by Bean7200 in topic Tone & content re: Inuit
Former good articleDenmark was one of the Geography and places good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
On this day...Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 28, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
May 10, 2006Good article nomineeListed
January 29, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
December 19, 2007Good article reassessmentDelisted
February 18, 2012Peer reviewReviewed
May 18, 2014Peer reviewReviewed
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on June 5, 2004, June 5, 2005, June 5, 2006, June 5, 2007, June 5, 2008, and June 5, 2012.
Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive This article was on the Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive for the week of April 24, 2006.
Current status: Delisted good article

Fukuyama quote

[edit]

Is Fukuyama's quote about "getting to Denmark" due for the lead? I would understand including it within the article body, but I feel like it's a bit WP:UNDUE and too detailed to include a relatively old phrase from one political scientist in the lead, which is supposed to summarize the contents of the article body. The Account 2 (talk) 16:25, 7 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

I see your point and agree. It would be interesting to move it to the article body though. Straight out removal feels like a loss of relevant information. Wilk10 (talk) 16:47, 7 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
I agree that it contains interesting info which can be preserved, so I moved it into the article body. The Account 2 (talk) 16:50, 7 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Greenland

[edit]

If the map of France displays French Guiana in green color as a part of France, why isn't Greenland displayed the same way as a part of Denmark? Gigman (talk) 22:22, 8 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Because this page is about only a part of the Kingdom of Denmark. The latter does show Greenland shaded in green. GoodDay (talk) 22:30, 8 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
PS - TBH, at times I get confused with this article & the (aka Danish Realm) kingdom article GoodDay (talk) 22:34, 8 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

"Dennmark" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirect Dennmark has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 February 15 § A mass of pseudo-G5s until a consensus is reached. Deacon Vorbis (carbon  videos) 16:11, 15 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 17 April 2026

[edit]

The sentence at the end of the Climate section currently reads: “In the middle of summer, it is light all night long.”

This appears to be misleading in the context of Denmark proper. While summer nights are very short and remain in twilight, it is not fully light all night at Denmark’s latitude. Continuous daylight (midnight sun) occurs only in areas north of the Arctic Circle, such as parts of Greenland. ~2026-23636-22 (talk) 08:30, 17 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want made. Please detail the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate.Tosca-the-engineer (talk) 10:56, 17 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Tone & content re: Inuit

[edit]

Firstly, the page as a whole would benefit from an Indigenous peoples section under History (see Canada and U.S.). Short of that, this passage (appearing verbatim in Demographics: Population and Culture: Human Rights) could use an update:

"From the 18th century up to the 1970s, the Danish government (Dano-Norwegian until 1814) tried to assimilate the Greenlandic Inuit, encouraging them to adopt the majority language and culture. Because of this "Danization process", some persons of Inuit ancestry now identify their mother tongue as Danish."

Given that the surrounding content re: Inuit in Human Rights is sourced and more focused, this passage should be removed from that section entirely. It seems largely inappropriate for Population as well: lacking available demographic information, any citation, and using a non-neutral tone.

- Change "From the...1970s" to "Though Greenlandic Inuit are recognized by the Danish government as an indigenous people and they receive Danish citizenship, they have no specific legal status or rights." Source: Denmark and Greenland, Mondo Internazionale.

- Change "tried to assimilate...and culture" to "implemented forced assimilation techniques including the removal of children in the 1950s, and sterilization of women into the 1970s." Sources: Speaking Up for Women, UNRIC; A Failed Social Experiment, CNN; Denmark's Dark History, El País.

- Change "Because of this...as Danish" to "As of 2024, over 17,000 Greenlandic people (people with Greenlandic or Greenlandic Inuit heritage) lived in Denmark." Source: Greenland in Figures 2025, Greenland Statistics. Bean7200 (talk) 16:07, 15 May 2026 (UTC)Reply