Talk:Demand sensing

Old talk

This article clearly explains the limits of traditionnal states that Demand Sensing uses different data and different mathmatical techniques. It would be helpful to have a description of these data more precise than promotion, launch and stocks.

Morevover, it would be helpful to understand which new mathematical techniques are involved.

Lastly, a reference to an independent study should be added to the statement that DS improves forecast accuracy by up to 30%. CedricHT (talk) 07:16, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Demand Sensing is a joke. There is no thing as different mathematical techniques for demand sensing. I have tried to put a reference (of mine) pinpointing the nonsense, but the edit has been reverted. Joannes Vermorel (talk) 20:43, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

Written like a marketing advert

There appears to be very little substance backing the bold claims of "demand sensing" compared to the still-very-much-active area of plain "time-series forecasting", in particular, the complete lack of any published peer-reviewed algorithms begs the question of the solidity of any of the claims.

Joannes Vermorel (talk) 16:06, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

I removed most of the article as unrefferenced and of little direct relevance to the subject. I did some copyvio search and see that most of it was piecewise copied from texts by businesses which are in this business, i.e., it seems you are right, this is a snake oil advertorial. Staszek Lem (talk) 18:47, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

The page should include a section on supply chain specialists who are opposing the non-sense of demand sensing. This was the sense of my edit - which has been reverted.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Demand_sensing&oldid=prev&diff=1280439299 Joannes Vermorel (talk) 20:42, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

Your edit was rightfully reverted because it is merely an advertisement for your company. MarioGom (talk) 08:41, 15 March 2025 (UTC)