Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a21f462338506e2a

Jump to content

Talk:Demand-side platform

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 5 months ago by ~2026-94136-6 in topic marketing blog

Clean up lead paragraph

[edit]

This is a very awkward sentence in the lead paragraph:

Real time bidding for displaying online ads takes place within the ad exchanges, and by utilizing a DSP, marketers can manage their bids for the banners and the pricing for the data that they are layering on to target their audiences.

There are too many problems with it to enumerate. It needs a rewrite.Mathglot (talk) 19:25, 8 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

I tried, it seems to have gotten a little better)) - Leonid "Leo" Belov (talk) (contribs) 18:50, 18 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Indiscriminate list

[edit]

I have reverted (for a second time) a list of companies (possibly non-notable). The WP:BURDEN is on the person who wants to include this list to support its inclusion, and so far all we have is an editor's assertion and a Canadian source. The cited source appears to list IAB Canada members only, whether they are notable or not. The fact is, only one is notable enough for a Wikipedia entry.

Wikipedia is not a list of indiscriminate information. The presence of lists like this in articles tends to become a spam magnet. I've seen this many times before.

Wikipedia:Lists (stand-alone lists)#Selection criteria describes the criteria for such a list. I don't see any but one item meeting the criteria for this guideline, given the single source currently in the article. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:31, 12 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

I just took out a number of spammy wikilinks. Anons and SPAs keep putting these in, mostly as redlinks. If it doesn't already have a Wikipedia article, please don't link to it. Thanks. John Nagle (talk) 22:34, 1 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

marketing blog

[edit]

Hi Kuru: I was looking for a clear source for so much unreferenced material and overlooked it was a company's marketing blog, so thanks for kicking it out.~2026-94136-6 (talk) 22:28, 16 February 2026 (UTC)Reply