Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2219693396ecf6a

Jump to content

Talk:Delftware

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

I have begun to expand this article as part of a general project of linking all the articles referring to pottery decorated in tin-glaze. Marshall46 13:19, 2 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

No mention of Ming Dynasty?

[edit]

Shouldn't this be in there?68.107.83.19 06:46, 11 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Why Ming Dynasty particularly? This is sufficient: "Delftware inspired by Chinese originals persisted from about 1630 to the mid-eighteenth century alongside European patterns." Marshall46 (talk) 22:39, 9 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Marl

[edit]

(1) Marl is a type of clay, for example Eturia marl. (2) Earthenware is a type of ceramic, \3) Occasionally found description of earthenware clay needs proper interpretation, it means a clay body that when correctly fired forms earthenware, (4) saying Marl is rich is calcium compounds is more accurate than lime, which is CaO. Although oxides are listed in XRF results they are not found discretely in Marl, or for that matter in other clays. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.153.170.162 (talk) 12:08, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

The mention of marl in the article is verified. You give no source for your statements. Wikipedia is not the place for original research or an editor's point of view. Marshall46 (talk) 20:20, 8 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
The edits by the editor were not original research or point of view - rather they improved the article by giving a more correct description. If correctly quoted from the cited book then its author has a limited understanding of the subject. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.154.153.114 (talk) 21:25, 19 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

See Also

[edit]

The "See Also" section should lose the names of porcelain factories except where they were established on the sites of former tinglaze factories or were established by entrepreneurs previously engaged in faience making. So, Weesp and Porsgrund could go as Wikipedia's articles on them don't mention delftware. Modern undertakings which produce several classes of ceramics including tinglaze could also go unless they originally produced tinglaze. Articles on them could link to this page to explain term.truthordare (talk) 08:04, 5 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Agreed... be bold make the changes. Theroadislong (talk) 09:27, 5 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
[edit]

Is there a source, that the part "Tile gallery" is Delftware? Regards, Conny (talk) 18:21, 10 November 2018 (UTC).Reply

Why, do you have a concern? Johnbod (talk) 19:00, 10 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education assignment: IADL 1110 Introduction to Information Studies

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 18 August 2025 and 11 October 2025. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): TheConvention (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Dhughes33 (talk) 10:17, 6 September 2025 (UTC)Reply