Talk:Deimachus
Add topicLatest comment: 1 year ago by 78.98.159.59 in topic CITED ARTICLE
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
What is this garbage?
[edit]Article currently includes this pointless bloviating: "Generally speaking, the men who hitherto have written on the affairs of India, were a set of liars. Deimachus holds the first place in the list, Megasthenes comes next, while Onesicritus and Nearchus, with others of the same class, manage to stammer out a few words [of truth]."
This is Wikipedia. Article editors should make articles of facts not opinions and meta garbage. Please take out the trash, folks. 71.184.230.191 (talk) 18:40, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
CITED ARTICLE
[edit]Can anyone find the article of Claire Atwood cited here? It seems that neither the article nor the journal (Classical Historiography Review) exists. 78.98.159.59 (talk) 07:38, 3 July 2025 (UTC)