Talk:Defamation

	; Archives (Index) ;
	2013; 2014; 2015; 2016; 2018; 2019; 2022; 2023;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Defamation article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Add new text under old text.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Start a new topic

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives (index): 1: 3 years

Business Mid‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Journalism High‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Top‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Skepticism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory, conspiracy theories, and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

R v Orme & Nutt

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The article quotes from what seems to be presented as the judgment in R v Orme & Nutt (1700) but such a case does not seem to exist. There is a case R v Orme and Nutt (1792) 91 E.R. 1224 which is 92 years later than cited here. Coincidentally, another case cited in this article, King v. Osborne (1732) 94 Eng. Rep. 406, which report is not a report on the case but on the granting of an information for it, cites "R v Orme Trin. 11 W. [1700]" – this chronologically cannot possibly be the same case as R v Orme & Nutt (1792). Moreover, neither of the citations in the article is sufficient to verify the quotations that are purportedly supported by them. Hairy Dude (talk) 15:40, 9 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

The Netherlands

Latest comment: 2 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

It's in the Dutch Penal Code, art. 262, but the Police will tell you they only have time for serious crimes. tgeorgescu (talk) 08:51, 25 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

source needed | One Reaction was here. Got a complaint? 12:27, 12 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

Talk:Defamation

R v Orme & Nutt

The Netherlands

Archives (Index)
2013 2014 2015 2016 2018 2019 2022 2023
This page is archived by ClueBot III.