Talk:Deccan Chronicle

neutrality disputed

The previous "version" (before I edited it) of this article seemed to have been written a person who benefits monetarily from this newspaper because the article did not respect the neutrality law of the website. I would suggest that this article be kept under scrutiny.

I believe that the article now contains facts alone without commentary so the advertisement tag can be removed.

Abhishekmathur (talk) 02:11, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Yes, and the vandaliser did it again. Although I have reversed it, i hope this article gets locked to prevent such instances in the future. Overspeeding Gorilla (talk) 11:37, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Nostalgia

in 80's DC used to carry a full 2 pages of movie listsings in the 100 odd theatres in the city. gone are the theatres and DC also has changed. --Hydman 13:13, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Content

DC used to be anti TDP and pro congress. It seems to be more neutral now. also would like to elaborate on the spicy nature of the paper. Any one concurring with me??--Hydman 13:13, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

I agree it is more neutal now... And the paper is becoming spicier everyday and this is not good for it,... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.200.112.5 (talk) 17:56, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Deccan Chargers

I'm surprised there was no mention in the article about the Deccan Chargers IPL franchise that The Deccan Chronicle owns! Especially because the IPL is already underway. I added my two cents about it. Cheers! Julyda4th (talk) 15:02, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

I have changed the formatting for it to resemble other sectionsAbhishekmathur (talk) 01:44, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

maybe a little more background on the owners will also help —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.22.51.146 (talk) 04:27, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Citations and references

This article, now, is not like an advertisement and thus I have removed the advert template but citations are missing. Thus I have put the citations missing tag. --Srinivas G Phani 13:09, 13 May 2009 (UTC)