Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a268959d5e93ecfa

Jump to content

Talk:Deborah Schembri

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 5 years ago by SL93 in topic Did you know nomination

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 07:24, 17 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

  • ... that the Catholic Church barred Deborah Schembri from practicing law in ecclesiastical court because she led a campaign to legalize divorce in Malta? Source: "Her outspoken position on divorce has cost Schembri dearly. Recently, the church authorities barred her from practising in ecclesiastical tribunals, which rules over marriage annulments."

Created by DanCherek (talk). Self-nominated at 02:42, 4 April 2021 (UTC).Reply

    General: Article is new enough and long enough
    Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

    Hook eligibility:

    • Cited: Yes
    • Interesting: Yes
    • Other problems: Yes
    QPQ: Done.

    Overall: Article is just barely over the 1500 B minimum prose size, Earwig had nothing, hook is sourced. One date under the first heading needs to be changed to "dmy" format. A touch more detail on her parliamentary career would be good as well, perhaps a little about what she did while in office or specifics about particular political positions, rather than just a recap of her electoral history (which, to be fair, could be forked off to a subheader under the "Member of Parliament" header. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 06:07, 5 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

    Thanks for the review. I will try to get to this in the next few days. DanCherek (talk) 13:46, 6 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
    @PCN02WPS: I've fixed the date format and expanded the section a bit, would appreciate another quick review! Thanks, DanCherek (talk) 22:22, 9 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
    well done, looks great! Good to go. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 22:28, 9 April 2021 (UTC)Reply