Talk:Day26

Merger proposal

Per Wikipedia:Music#Albums_and_songs: "Album articles with little more than a track listing may be more appropriately merged into the artist's main article or discography article, space permitting." - Mdsummermsw (talk) 20:52, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

• I would not be against this; there really is next to no information and not even a verifiable tracklisting. —Hello, Control ^{Hello, Tony} 22:09, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
• well the album is coming out soon so there will be no point to merge it because a separate page will most likely be created again for the album. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.194.25.145 (talk) 21:50, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
  • I agree; at this point (unless the album doesn't come out on the release date) that it is close enough and there is enough verified information to leave it alone. —Hello, Control ^{Hello, Tony} 22:13, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Disagree I believe that as the group gets bigger they will do more interviews and we will be able to add more in formation.CMJMEM (talk) 22:24, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Plagiarism and copyright violation

This article has been around for a long time and has been in terrible shape for just as long, so it'll probably be too much work to figure out specifically who was the asshole who did this, but the version of this article before my recent edits was almost completely copied and pasted from two websites, http://glamorousparties.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=6&Itemid=1 and www.tvrage.com/Making_the_Band_4 (I can't link it because that domain is blacklisted). Everyone please be vigilant in the future of additions to this article—particularly, if you see large amounts of text added in a single edit, with no wikilinks, no references, or strange formatting, it is likely that the text was copied from somewhere and is plagiarism. —Politizer ^talk/_contribs 01:43, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Edit Mistake

Hi there, I was trying to edit the table labeled "Singles", but I seem to have moved that table and another to the references section, and I do not know how to move it back. Sorry about that, but I wanted to let someone know so it could be fixed. 128.118.231.128 (talk) 18:13, 16 March 2009 (UTC)