Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
The following Wikipedia contributorhas declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
As per WP:DOB (a section of the WP:BLP policy) I have removed the uncited exact date of birth from the article. It should not be restored unless it is not only cited, but cited to a source or soures which make it clear that the date has been widely published, or else published with the subject's approval. This might be clear if the sources is itself notable and widely published, or if there are multiple reliable sources, or if the sources says or plainly implies that the date was published with the subject's consent, or in other ways. The day and month of birth of a living person are of little encyclopedic value, while making them public can contribute to identity theft and other problems. The year suffices to place the subject in chronological context. See WT:BLP#Dates of birth and info boxes for discussion. DES(talk)20:09, 22 August 2015 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I tried to add a citation, for the statement about the Billboard's Critic's Choice award. But the link I wanted to add, to www.examiner.com/article/interview-with-musicians-david-helpling-and-jon-jenkins-on-the-crossing, was rejected as examiner.com is blacklisted. Maproom (talk) 07:54, 23 August 2015 (UTC)Reply
Maproom, according to Examiner.com and MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist/Common requests the site Examiner.com is basically a collection of blogs with no editorial oversight whatsoever. Moreover, it pays contributors on a by-the-byte basis, giving them an incentive to post as much volume as possible, and no incentive to spend time checking anything. Therefore it is normally not considered a reliable source. If Justin Tedaldi has a particularly good rep he might be reliable personally, and we could request whitelisting. But I am seeing other requests for whitelisting of specific pages from Examiner.com being denied at MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist. Can't we source this award directly to Billboard? Also, as an interview, all but the intro here is WP:PRIMARY so it is of limited use anyway. DES(talk)12:46, 23 August 2015 (UTC)Reply
