Talk:David Hahn
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the David Hahn article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 12 months |
| This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Trouble?
[edit]From the section titled "Creation of the neutron source", this sentence seems "off".
"This was also probably from a fear they would use the results of such an examination to further his trouble."'
It starts with the idea that Hahn was suspected of suffering radiation poisoning of some sort, and that it was recommended by someone that he get "examined" at a nuclear lab and not a hospital ER or anything like that, and Hahn "refused" the examination. The entire narrative sounds highly suspect, because if this guy is radioactive law enforcement is going to gather the evidence and his "refusal" isn't going to mean anything. Simple logic. Which indicates to me that no one seriously thought he was radioactive in a way that was a national security threat. The whole narrative is WRONG and sounds like fluffed-up BS intended to manufacture interest in events that have never happened. But then the entire line goes wildly off the rails when the reason for his refusal is "trouble", but for who, what trouble, etc... isn't mentioned and I think the reason why is because it's all fake, as in hoax. Hype, and no substance. Either way, at minimum, this sentence should be scrubbed for being pointless and without any encyclopedic value. It's inclusion undermines the credibility of the entire Article, and there isn't much here IMO. Nothing in this Article indicates anything happened other than a mentally ill person with paranoid schizophrenia did some crazy things with commonly available household smoke detectors, and also having sores all over your face is also a symptom of meth use. IMO this person and this Article is extremely not noteworthy.72.180.111.79 (talk) 01:01, 17 August 2025 (UTC)

