Talk:David Boje

Tag

I placed the tag on this page as the main contributor is the subject. BLP policy is clear, on your own article you should confine yourself to correcting mistakes. --Snowded ^TALK 19:25, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

--

THis is ridiculous

Of course the page is about me. It is titled David Boje

What would you do if I went to the Snowden page and said delete it because it is autobriographical

Signed,

David Boje — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dboje (talk • contribs) 20:11, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

David, BLP policy says that you should NOT edit your own article, that is what the tag referenced. The Snowden page has not been edited by me other than an odd factual correction and vandalism removal. It was written by other editors. Get the point now?--Snowded ^TALK 20:18, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

OK despite the silliness of the section below I have done same basic work to wikify this. Its worth noting that there are no third party citations and as it stands the article could be subject to deletion on grounds of notability. Policy says that without one reliable third party source it is subject to deletion. I think it qualifies as notable per criteria 1 of [[WP::Notability_(academics)| this policy]] but that has to be demonstrated by reliable third party sources. --Snowded ^TALK 21:07, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

I am being harassed by Dave Snowden

Wherever I go in Wikipedia, even in the David Boje page, I am pursued by Dave Snowden.

This is what happened to the once quite useful antenarrative page, now gone.

This is the history of the deletion of the Antenarrative page. • 2:44, 1 March 2011 Ponyo (talk | contribs) deleted "Antenarrative" ‎ (G4: Recreation of a page that was deleted per a deletion discussion) • 01:49, 5 February 2011 Ron Ritzman (talk | contribs) deleted "Antenarrative" ‎ (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antenarrative (2nd nomination)) • 20:58, 29 December 2005 Howcheng (talk | contribs) deleted "Antenarrative" ‎ (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antenarrative) • A story concept being promoted by its inventor, Dboje (talk • contribs).Unsurprisingly most of the incoming links were added by Dboje: storytelling, story arc and Fabula and syuzhet. And the addition to Barbara Czarniawska was added by a sock puppet (but I hasten to say that I saw no evidence that it was a sock puppet of Dboje). Has anything changed since the AfD five years ago? — RHaworth (talk • contribs) 23:38, 28 January 2011 (UTC)}} • * Delete. As noted, this is part of a walled garden of articles by User:Dboje about theories he himself has originated, with "references" that don't make it clear if any part of these theories is accepted by others, and the article itself is well-fortified with gibberish and evasion rather than a description of the thing named. Even assuming notability of this concept could be clearly shown, the article would need a complete rewrite, so the present text is superfluous in any case. — Gavia immer (talk) 02:22, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

• * Delete per nomination, without third party evidence of use/adoption and some balancing criticism this reads like a promotional piece; other related articles look to be extracts from Boje. Full disclosure, I know of Boje's work and am involved in the field of organisational narrative. --Snowded TALK 07:18, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

• Should this article be moved to wikiversity?Harrypotter (talk) 08:18, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

 •    * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related

deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:38, 29 January 2011 (UTC) • * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:39, 29 January 2011 (UTC) • * Delete - Agree with Snowded. -- Joaquin008 (talk) 15:48, 29 January 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dboje (talk • contribs)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on David Boje. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100702192431/http://cbae.nmsu.edu/~dboje/nf/index.htm to http://cbae.nmsu.edu/~dboje/nf/index.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:54, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

I am submitting these changes, and the reasons for them for editor review

== Edit request: remove two unsourced claims ==

{{edit request}}

I am the subject of this article and have a declared conflict of interest. I am not editing the article directly. I am proposing two specific removals per BLP policy, both of which concern material that lacks reliable published sources.

1. Remove the "Tamaraland and the Tesseract" subsection in full

The paragraph reads: "He subsequently extended this into the Tesseract framework — a four-dimensional model for critical organization inquiry incorporating space, time, possibility, and interference — applied to the study of organizational change and AI accountability."

No reliable published source is cited for the "Tesseract framework" as a named theoretical construct. The passage does not meet the sourcing standard required by WP:BLP for specific scholarly claims. I propose removing the entire subsection. The Tamaraland concept is already adequately covered in the preceding paragraph on antenarrative theory with a proper citation.

2. Remove "and from the Western Academy of Management" from the Recognition section

The sentence currently reads: "Boje has received lifetime achievement awards from the Organization Development and Change Division of the Academy of Management and from the Western Academy of Management."

The WAM lifetime achievement award is not supported by a cited reliable source in the article. The Academy of Management award is verifiable through AOM divisional records; the WAM claim is not. I propose the sentence be changed to:

"Boje has received a lifetime achievement award from the Organization Development and Change Division of the Academy of Management."

Both changes bring the article into compliance with WP:BLP and WP:V. No new claims are being added. [[User:Davidboje|Davidboje]] ([[User talk:Davidboje|talk]]) Davidboje (talk) 23:18, 28 July 2026 (UTC)