Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a28dc0e9fc08845c

Jump to content

Talk:Daoguang Emperor

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 13 years ago by CWH in topic Section Court Intrigues and Incidents

Untitled

[edit]

Why are we using pinyin for historical names? This Ta Tsing emperor was known in English as Taukwang. Ta Tsing signed numerous treaties with other countries. The official language was Manchu and the English versions of treaties read "Taokwang". We should not take such a sinocentric approach in historical articles.Alamoana (talk) 06:35, 22 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Court intrigue

[edit]

Qing dynasty genealogy and other chinese sources state that Daoguang did have an older brother but died very young. Also Daoguang's elderst son died aged 22/23 (1808-1831). User:TYK1986 —Preceding undated comment added 13:13, 11 June 2011 (UTC).Reply

Reign as emperor and the opium trade

[edit]

User:Pawyilee/sandbox/opium trade contains an extract from the journal of Edmund Roberts (diplomat) on the growth of opium trade, 1817-1832, and his view of why efforts to control it were, in his words, a farce. I'm asking for help incorporating an appropriate bit into this article. I'd also appreciate help on posting any or all of his journal to Wikisource. I've read the directions there, and they baffle me. --Pawyilee (talk) 08:26, 18 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Section Court Intrigues and Incidents

[edit]

While these incidents may have taken place, the source is very far from a Reliable Source when there are excellent ones available. I'm also hoping that removing this material will inspire someone better qualified than I to improve the article, for the Daoguang Emperor was more interesting and his reign more consequential than the present version of the article would lead a reader to think. ch (talk) 08:09, 25 December 2012 (UTC)Reply