Talk:Daniel Stowe Conservancy
Add topicLatest comment: 1 year ago by Multimedia Editor in topic Remove "promotional content" heading
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Impartiality
[edit]This article is written in a method that doesn't feel very objective and sounds like an advertisement for the establishment. Thoughts on changes? 172.58.152.255 (talk) 14:30, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry about the fact it took literal years for someone to reply to this talk post, but I definitely agree. There's no sources or references, either.
- RidgelantRL (talk) 02:39, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Remove "promotional content" heading
[edit]Hi folks,
I was wondering if it would be okay for me to remove the promotional content heading, or would the article need to be rewritten more before we do that? I'd appreciate examples of what may need to be rewritten.
Thanks!
RidgelantRL (talk) 01:07, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Done. I also reviewed the article and did not see any promotional content. The work you did in that regard appears to have fixed the areas that were needed. The cleanup tag has now been removed. Multimedia Editor (talk) 22:28, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Start-Class North Carolina articles
- Low-importance North Carolina articles
- WikiProject North Carolina articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- Start-Class Horticulture and gardening articles
- Low-importance Horticulture and gardening articles
- WikiProject Horticulture and Gardening articles