Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a258f68f2f0f1e9f

Jump to content

Talk:Daniel Grossberg

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by PorkNBeanz in topic Restructuring of article

Current controversy

[edit]

Currently, several women are alleging that Grossberg engaged in sexual misconduct. Been ongoing for a minute. I probably have a COI and refraining from editing the article. Zmfrye02 (talk) 18:23, 20 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Restructuring of article

[edit]

@PorkNBeanz

Here you made a restructure of the article, I reverted it, then attempted to incorporate your edit back in with an === Early career === subsection. The sexual harassment portion of the article is very serious, and should be given a lot of weight, as it will probably determine Grossberg's future. I do recognize you were probably working in Good Faith. I don't think we need to add much more to the section at this time, as no new news have broken and seeing as it may be an ongoing topic. I am heading out, so I may not respond to any replies until tomorrow. Masohpotato (talk) 01:46, 28 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thank you so much for your response. I have located additional references related to the subject's professional career, which I will incorporate into the early career subsection as my intention is just to throughly document the subject's works and political interests throughout their career. Based on all current information I can find, it appears that the investigation into the aforementioned allegations remains ongoing. Given the length and detail of the section addressing the allegations, I would appreciate your perspective on how best to manage this content as new information becomes available. If you have specific recommendations for maintaining accuracy and neutralitywhile reflecting the seriousness of the allegations, please let me know. PorkNBeanz (talk) 22:45, 28 May 2025 (UTC)Reply