Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a24261e4e82cc77b

Jump to content

Talk:Dan Rottenberg

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Ontheroad1957 in topic Improving list of associated publications

Untitled

[edit]

As requested, I've added references to the biography page I recently created about myself. I hope this will qualify the biography for inclusion.

I'm a longtime admirer and user of Wikipedia. I'm also the author of ten books on diverse subjects, on some of which I am the leading authority. I would like to improve Wikipedia entries where I find errors, but I'm new to the editing process— I only got into it this month. So thanks, Wiki editors, for your patience and forbearance.

One general observation: As requested, I've provided citations for my personal biography. But the fact is, I was the primary source of most of the information in those citations, and I suspect the same holds true for articles written about most living people. So the policy of requiring people to footnote their own biographies, while surely well-intentioned, strikes me as pointless.

Dan Rottenberg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danredmount (talkcontribs) 21:35, 29 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Oh dear, no. You've missed the point -- which is that we also have a policy that people should not be the ones to write their own biographies. You can surely correct factual errors in your own biography, but you shouldn't be the one to have started it. And no, most articles about living people are not written by the subjects. DS (talk) 13:49, 28 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Improving list of associated publications

[edit]

Given the long list of publications that are associated with the subject, I think it would be more appropriate to list these either as a proper list and/or in their own subheading. Let me know if anyone has thoughts on the matter. Ontheroad1957 (talk) 19:45, 9 August 2017 (UTC)Reply