Talk:Dan Bain

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dan Bain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930080341/http://www.legendsofhockey.net:8080/LegendsOfHockey/jsp/SilverwareTrophyWinner.jsp?tro=STC&year=1895-96Feb to http://www.legendsofhockey.net/LegendsOfHockey/jsp/SilverwareTrophyWinner.jsp?tro=STC&year=1895-96Feb

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:36, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Dan Bain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120320053916/http://umanitoba.ca/science/delta_marsh/reports/1996/history.pdf to http://umanitoba.ca/science/delta_marsh/reports/1996/history.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100117030507/http://www.halloffame.mb.ca:80/honoured/1981/dbain.htm to http://www.halloffame.mb.ca/honoured/1981/dbain.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131023120226/http://www.sportshall.ca/honoured-members/27968/donald-dan-bain-2-2/ to http://www.sportshall.ca/honoured-members/27968/donald-dan-bain-2-2/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:12, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Spelling of Honorary

Here's how the Canadian Government spells it; spelling example. --BeckenhamBear (talk) 14:51, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

The template is perfectly valid for the article as a whole, regardless of one word. Please note, that I did not change the word's spelling. I only inserted the template. There is a difference.Flibirigit (talk) 15:11, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

That would be me, who just learned that is how it is spelt. Kaiser matias (talk) 15:34, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Canadian English has its quirks, eh? Flibirigit (talk) 15:58, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Far too many. Kaiser matias (talk) 00:10, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Another FAC run?

@Kaiser matias: I'm going through some good articles to see if there are any that could be close to FA status and, after a quick skim, this might be close to meeting the FA criteria. I'd be interested in getting this nominated at FAC, either as a co-nom or as an individual nom from one of us. Would you like to work on the article together for a co-nom, have one of us nominate it separately, or just not nominate this at all? Z1720 (talk) 15:37, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up. I've largely stepped away from here for now, but if you think you want to go forward with the nomination, you have my full support there. Would be nice to finally have it reach that status, and I wish you all the best if you proceed. Kaiser matias (talk) 15:40, 10 July 2026 (UTC)