Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a252e7eb4ca970b8

Jump to content

Talk:Damart

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Ww2censor in topic Controversy

Deletion proposal

[edit]

Damartex or Damart?

[edit]

The term "Damartex" is suddenly introduced with no warning - is it the same thing, something else, or what? The way it reads at the moment tempts me just to change it to "Damart" but I hope there's more to it than that! :) DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered (talk) 14:55, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Structure - attempt to update

[edit]

The present structure seems a little wrong, with too many things of non-equivalent value at the same level. I am planning to have a little go at something I hope works better - what do you think? Best wishes, DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered (talk) 14:56, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Motorcyclists

[edit]

When Ah were young (eeee) Damart was the thermals de choix for the discerning biker - this is how I know about them! Is the Damart-bikes connection strong enough to be significant (as in, worth a mention), and is it likely that it is documented somewhere? Just a thought. Cheers, DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered (talk) 15:02, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Company ownership

[edit]

I heard a rumour going around back in 1992 that this company was actually taken over and owned by a company called 'Kmart'. Wondering if this is true? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.12.29.193 (talk) 15:58, 15 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Controversy

[edit]

Despite the 2005 outrage, this disgusting company continues to use pressure selling techniques with its elderly customers, especially using bogus 'lottery wins' and marking mailshots to indicate they they are somehow official documents or accounts related. I don't have a ref but my 81 year old mother has personal experience of this. --Ef80 (talk) 09:56, 16 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

So, unfortunately that is WP:OR lacking WP:RS, unless you can find some. ww2censor (talk) 14:35, 16 July 2012 (UTC)Reply