Talk:Dagger-axe
Add topicLatest comment: 5 years ago by 89.201.185.4 in topic Chinese Fang ?
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
untitled
[edit]Needs a picture to be useful. Mathiastck 21:09, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- I had a lovely photo, but I ended up not using it, because I was unsure of the legal status. See Wikipedia talk:Image use policy/copyright#Museum --Iustinus 00:09, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Change Name?
[edit]I think this article be titled Ge, which is more in line with how this item is reference in historical study. Thoughts? Elijahmeeks 14:47, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
Stone dagger
[edit]Maybe supply approx. age and type of stone (?basalt) of dagger head — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.115.37.71 (talk) 23:01, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Chinese Fang ?
[edit]Acc to this p5 and p23 it is also called Fang or Chinese fang. 89.201.185.4 (talk) 21:05, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class China-related articles
- Low-importance China-related articles
- Start-Class China-related articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject China articles
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class military science, technology, and theory articles
- Military science, technology, and theory task force articles
- C-Class weaponry articles
- Weaponry task force articles
- C-Class Asian military history articles
- Asian military history task force articles
- C-Class Chinese military history articles
- Chinese military history task force articles