Talk:D battery
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the D battery article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
[edit]needs to say physical dimensions 207.38.195.47 (talk) 07:55, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
Merging this article with "List of battery sizes"
[edit]I've reverted changes made by Wtshymanski, which made this page redirect to List of battery sizes, as this was done without any consultation on the talk page. However, it may make sense to merge this page into the List of battery sizes page. I have also reverted similar changes made by Wtshymanski to AAA battery, AA battery, and C battery pages. --Supergloom (talk) 10:35, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
- See talk at List of battery sizes. --Wtshymanski (talk) 17:34, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
- Try again, see Talk:List of battery sizes. --Wtshymanski (talk)
Capacity
[edit]So the for Alkaline D-Cells the table lists the capacity as 1,200-1,800 mAh. Right under that it says the capacity of an Energiser (Alkaline) D-Cell as 10,000mAh to 20,000mAh. Duracell specifies 13,000mAh @ 250mA for their ultra [1]. I believe the data in the table may be a typo, it's uncited. Flagpolewiki (talk) 12:38, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
- It was the previous edit, which i have now reverted. Bizarre. Flagpolewiki (talk) 13:13, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
References
Regarding NiMH, capacity for D-Cells are closer to 10,000mAh for regular and 8,000 for LSD. NiMH energy density is never higher than typical alkaline. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.149.137.93 (talk) 02:38, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
IEC Battery name
[edit]In the "Dimension and capacity" table, the IEC battery names for NiCd and NiMH are swapped around from the IEC names in the table "Common" in the names section of the article. I don't know which is correct, so I won't edit it. 203.63.9.100 (talk) 05:01, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- Fixed. Still shouldn't be an article, though. --Wtshymanski (talk) 00:41, 5 July 2022 (UTC)