Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2243432fba9f41a

Jump to content

Talk:DX Group

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Wolliwoo23 in topic Criticism Section Added

The page has been created based on factual information, and the style has been mirrored from other existing pages in order to ensure it remains as encyclopaedic as possible.

The content is very neutral and does not in any way hype up our business or try and act as an advertisement. Quite the opposite has been intended. I shall try and make a few adjustments, but please take a look at some of our competitors so you can see that I have tried to write in a similar format whilst attempting to write similar sort of content. I do plan to beef it up so that there is more detail and content in the near and long term future, but I should be clear that this page is not designed to act as an advertisement in any way - but purely as a source for information on the DX Group business.

It is important to note that due to DX Groups acquisition of Nightfreight last week, I feel it is important that both Nightfreight and DX Group have pages so people can educate themselves better about the deal and the two companies.

Chris griffiths uk (talk) 11:03, 21 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

It would help an awful lot if you could include some references from reliable sources.--sparkl!sm hey! 11:28, 21 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
It would also be beneficial if you declared your interest, as it appears you are employed by this company. Then you would benefit from the assumption of good faith by other editors. --Drm310 (talk) 15:54, 23 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Criticism Section Added

[edit]

I've added a criticism section as the article reads way too much like an advert, regardless of what the above person said. --86.8.80.137 (talk) 10:38, 22 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Looks OK now, I think. I'm independent! (User: Wolliwoo23 —Preceding undated comment added 17:26, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply