Talk:DJ E
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 30 days ago by RTSthestardust in topic GA review
| DJ E has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: July 4, 2026. (Reviewed version). |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GA review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:DJ E/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Cathodography (talk · contribs) 00:11, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
Reviewer: RTSthestardust (talk · contribs) 05:54, 4 July 2026 (UTC)
Hello, my name is RTSthestardust, and I will review your nomination of DJ E for GA-status. - RTSthestardust (talk) 05:54, 4 July 2026 (UTC)
- The article is interestingly written and also really good considering that only eight citations are used. Well-done! You've earned the GA! - RTSthestardust (talk) 06:06, 4 July 2026 (UTC)
GA Criteria Table
[edit]| Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Well-written: | ||
| 1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | Very good | |
| 1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | Very good | |
| 2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check: | ||
| 2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | All of them are well-structured; impressive considering that there's only eight citations. | |
| 2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | Well placed | |
| 2c. it contains no original research. | No issues here | |
| 2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | Highest copyvio is 16.7%, which is impressive considering the handful amount of citations | |
| 3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
| 3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | The background, release, composition, critical reception, and track list/personnel are evenly well-covered | |
| 3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | Very consistent, with no distracting issues spotted | |
| 4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | No issues here. | |
| 5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | Your percentage takes up 96.9% of the whole authorship, considering you made this an article; also very stable | |
| 6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
| 6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | Despite there just being the album cover, it carries a proper source and rationale. | |
| 6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | Yes; no description, considering that only the album cover is used. Despite this, an alt may be useful. | |
| 7. Overall assessment. | Pass | |
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Music good articles
- GA-Class Album articles
- WikiProject Albums articles
- GA-Class electronic music articles
- Low-importance electronic music articles
- WikiProject Electronic music articles
- GA-Class Latin music articles
- Low-importance Latin music articles
- Latin music articles
- GA-Class LGBTQ+ studies articles
- WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies articles
- GA-Class Spirituality articles
- Low-importance Spirituality articles