Talk:Czech Cup

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:59, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

---

---

Czech Republic Football Cup → Czech Cup – Reliable English-language sources, e.g. Guardian, BBC and Independent all use this name with no hits for the current variant, which seems to be overly disambiguous considering no other Czech national cups apparently exist other than the Tipsport Hockey Cup.

The Czech name is sponsored (Pohár České pošty, Czech Post Cup) and the formerly used "neutral name" of Pohár ČMFS is obsolete as the ČMFS has been renamed to the FAČR, and to call it the FAČR Cup would be WP:OR. The most general name used in Czech is Český pohár, or "Czech Cup" in English. C679 09:41, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. C679 09:43, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

As long as there are redirects, who cares. Btw I once created Czech Women's Cup for the women's edition. :-) -Koppapa (talk) 17:23, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

• Comment. While the Czech Cup is used widely in the English sources, I would say it's still an ambiguous name. This name can refer to cup competition in virtually every sport played professionally in the Czech Rep. - Darwinek (talk) 09:31, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

True, but I believe it qualifies as a main topic. Precedent exists, with for example Danish Cup, Bulgarian Cup and Turkish Cup. C679 17:03, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

• Support. Unless an argument can be made that other competitions use this name, and they are as notable as this, then it should be moved as WP:PRIMARYTOPIC without the need for unecessary disambiguation. Zarcadia (talk) 22:08, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
• Support per Zarcadia. There's no evidence of any other articles that compete for the title, and it meets the consistency requirement of WP:CRITERIA. --BDD (talk) 22:24, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.