Talk:Cyclone Wanda

earlier comments

The Queensland floods affected places as far as Coober Pedy and Northern NSW. only 14 fatalities occured, thanks to the quick response from flood mitigation services.Cyclone Wanda triggered an air mass over Brisbane into intense rainfall. By R.Cario

the numbers of houses damaged is listed in the article twice - both with different values. Both values are incorrect, refer to this page (Emergency Management Australia - AusGov site) http://www.ema.gov.au/ema/emadisasters.nsf/9d804be3fb07ff5cca256d1100189e22/a6a4dce286660b23ca256d3300057baf?OpenDocument

FOR PICTURES - maybe ask these guys http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=578507

more info and pictures (would need permission) http://www.pictureqld.slq.qld.gov.au/home/features/bigwet —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.171.225.206 (talk) 10:09, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Regarding the number of homes that experienced flooding, I found this EMA page which says 13,00 homes. I have another source that says 14,000. McBride, Frank; et al. (2009). Brisbane 150 Stories. Brisbane City Council Publication. pp. 256–257. ISBN 978-1-875091-60-7. {{cite book}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help); Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help)

Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://www.ema.gov.au/ema/emadisasters.nsf/0/a6a4dce286660b23ca256d3300057baf?OpenDocument
  • In 1974 Brisbane flood on 2011-05-25 04:36:05, 404 Not Found
  • In 1974 Brisbane flood on 2011-06-06 20:47:05, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 20:47, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Dead link 2

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://www.disaster.qld.gov.au/disasters/flooding_history.asp
  • In 1974 Brisbane flood on 2011-05-25 04:36:05, 404 Not Found
  • In 1974 Brisbane flood on 2011-06-06 20:47:13, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 20:47, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Requested move 10 March 2025

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) Aviationwikiflight (talk) 17:17, 22 March 2025 (UTC)

---

1974 Brisbane flood → Cyclone Wanda – The storm that caused the flooding was named Wanda. Usually storm articles get the name for an article if they were named. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 06:10, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

Also, if it were to get moved, the Corinda landslip could also get merged there. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 06:11, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

• Support - The idea seems to make sense.Jason Rees (talk) 14:50, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Should we make a separate article of 1974 Brisbane floods

(snipped) These are the information. We can slightly shorten the impacts of Wanda Owen is the best GG (talk) 01:10, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

@Owen is the best GG:, I suggest adding that information to the Wanda article, which caused the floods. There's no need for a separate flood article at the time. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 01:13, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

Thank you. Should we add them as 'impacts' or 'effects' and 'aftermath'. I'd think a good image for cover of Wanda would be the 1974 Brisbane floods highlighting its impacts. Owen is the best GG (talk) 01:25, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

Depends if the info is preparations, impacts, or aftermath. Also typically we use a satellite image of a storm as the main image. Flood images can be included in the article as well. Hurricanehink mobile (talk) 14:15, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

Thank you :), but there is no storm image Owen is the best GG (talk) 22:25, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

Oh true! Unless a satellite image can be found, then yea, a flood image could work for the infobox. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 03:06, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

Good idea to use the original 1974 Brisbane floods infobox until we find a satellite image of Cyclone Wanda Owen is the best GG (talk) 03:18, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for doing that. Yea, you're right that it was formatted as a flood article for a while. But seeing as the floods were caused by a tropical cyclone, it should be formatted like a tropical cyclone article. I renamed the Effects to "Impact" for that reason. Keep up the good work though, Owen is the best GG! ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:14, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

Merge Corinda landslip?

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Seeing as Wanda caused the landslide, shouldn't the landslip article be merged here? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 15:40, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Support merge, aspect of the main subject that doesn't need to be separate when they can be covered together. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 00:33, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.