Talk:Cybistrini
Add topicLatest comment: 3 years ago by Klbrain in topic Proposed merge of Cybistrinae with Cybistrini
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | The content of Cybistrinae was merged into Cybistrini on 1 October 2022. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Qbugbot notice
[edit]This article was created by the bot Qbugbot. For more information, see User:Qbugbot/info. For questions and comments, leave a message at User:Qbugbot/talk.
Proposed merge of Cybistrinae with Cybistrini
[edit]These seven genera have been treated by some sources as a subfamily within Dytiscidae and by others as a tribe within Dytiscinae, We don't need two articles. William Avery (talk) 08:51, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
- Agree with merge. There is only one tribe in Cybistrinae, and it is widely accepted as distinct from Dytiscinae. Fredlyfish4 (talk) 11:31, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Merge completed Klbrain (talk) 09:11, 1 October 2022 (UTC)