Talk:Custom Ink
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Custom Ink article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article was nominated for deletion. Please review prior discussions if you are considering renomination.
|
| This page was proposed for deletion by K.e.coffman (talk · contribs) on 11 February 2019 with the comment: A WP:PROMO page on an unremarkable private business. Does not meet WP:NCORP; significant RS coverage not found. Created by Special:Contributions/Colleenaoreilly with no other contributions outside this topic. It was contested by Mojo Hand (talk · contribs) on 12 February 2019 with the comment: Remove PROD; article has been through 2 AFDs (one Keep and one no consensus). Can't really be considered uncontroversial deletion |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
Untitled
[edit]Custom Ink appears to have changed their name to two words. Updating accordingly Washcaps8 (talk) 18:50, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
Content from Requested Articles
[edit]In the list at Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies/M-S, there was a listing for Pear, which appears to correspond to Pear (company), which is now a redirect to Custom Ink. This content appears below. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 00:56, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
- Pear - An online sponsorship and grassroots fundraising platform connecting local organizations with national brands through social engagements. Formerly known as Apparel Media. [1] [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]
References
- ↑ https://www.pearup.com
- ↑ "Raising the bar on raising funds: Pear is changing the fundraising game".
- ↑ http://www.fastcompany.com/1742088/apparel-medias-interactive-t-shirts-boost-brands-campus
- ↑ "Apparel Media Puts Ads on Your Clothes". 28 June 2011.
- ↑ "Chicago technology venture capital scorecard for 2011". tribunedigital-chicagotribune.
- ↑ "US Cellular Calls on Community Engagement". Direct Marketing News. 28 May 2015.
- ↑ "CustomInk Nabs $40 Million in Funding from Revolution Growth, Adds Ted Leonsis to Its Board". 12 November 2013.
- ↑ "#50onFire: The People and Companies Heating up Marketing and Advertising in Chicago". Chicago Inno.
- ↑ "7 No Selling Fundraisers – Great for Schools | Raising Dollars for Non-Profits".
Some proposed changes
[edit] | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. Please see the reply section below for additional information about this request. |
Information to be added: Custom Ink gained new investors in early 2019. At the time, its value was estimated at more than 500 million. Explanation of issue: new information/news coverage References supporting change: https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2019/04/03/customink-which-built-fortune-t-shirts-sells-private-equity/
Information to be added: Custom Ink was #86 on Fortune's 100 Best Companies to Work For. Explanation of issue: new information/news coverage References supporting change: https://fortune.com/best-companies/custom-ink/
Information to be added: Custom Ink was listed among Washingtonian's top 50 great places to work in Washington, DC in 2019. Explanation of issue: new information/news coverage References supporting change: https://www.washingtonian.com/2019/05/01/great-places-work-washington-dc/ Custom Ink MB (talk) 16:37, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
Reply 16-AUG-2019
[edit]
Edit request declined
Custom Ink gained new investors in early 2019
This claim is vague by not describing the investors.At the time, its value was estimated at more than 500 million.
The date of this valuation has not been mentioned.Fortune's 100 Best Companies to Work For
andWashingtonian's top 50 great places to work in Washington, DC
By their very nature designations are subjective in that they represent a very specific point of view — the point of view of the individual or organization which determines who wins the designation and why. To counter this, a good practice is to limit the listing of designations to only those which are independently notable in Wikipedia.[a] To add these claims, please provide the WikiLink of these designations.
Regards, Spintendo 22:38, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
Notes
- ↑ A designation which is independently notable is recognized by having its own article in Wikipedia.