Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a24f1f2c9e9fc20a

Jump to content

Talk:Cushion

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Викидим in topic Merge cushion and pillow?

Comments

[edit]

"Cushions: often found in piles". I love it Njerseyguy (talk) 04:27, 18 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Merge cushion and pillow?

[edit]

Hi. It seems to me the two articles have much overlap, common sources, explanation of history, categories, etc. The terms are often used synonymously. I am not an expert and I not know which should or could be a section in the other, but it feels like a merge would consolidate future efforts. I have templates the article accordingly. --Ds13 (talk) 08:03, 8 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

No these should definitely not be merged. The terms are not synonymous in British English and to be honest are pretty much mutually exclusive. A pillow is typically used to rest one's head on in bed and a cushion is either decorative or used to prop oneself up in a chair. Lineslarge (talk) 21:00, 23 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose I feel there is a more fundamental reason for not merging these articles-- a pillow specifically refers to anything placed under the head to be used while sleeping. A cushion is simply something soft used to protect or comfort something from a hard surface. A pillow might also be a cushion, but not necessarily so. This said, I am removing the merger discussion template as it seems to be the general consensus that these articles should not be merged, and this has not received any further debate in several months. --Jonathan Farnham 04:33, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Unsourced, incorrect, irrelevant, Europe-centric and original research material

[edit]

Most of the material here lacks a source. Some of it is incorrect, such as the claim that a cushion is by definition covered in "ornamental" material (see prison furniture, saddle cushions, etc.). Some is of questionable relevancy or appears to be a kooky product of original research, such as the unsourced diversion into French and Spanish culture with its bizarre time references and myopic focus on part of European culture.Jtcarpet (talk) 20:23, 24 August 2014 (UTC)Reply