Talk:Cublington
Add topicLatest comment: 17 years ago by Tmol42 in topic Current revision as of 16:49, 30 June 2009 (edit) (undo)Jenuk1985 (talk | contribs)(Rm unsourced)
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Current revision as of 16:49, 30 June 2009 (edit) (undo)Jenuk1985 (talk | contribs)(Rm unsourced)
[edit]Supported. All articles in Wikipedia are supposed to have sources. What might be common knowledge to an original article contributor is not common knowledge to everyone. Unless a source is given people cannot check the veracity of an article for themselves. The inline 'unsourced' tags or an 'unreferenced' banner also alert all Wikipedia editors monitoring the unsourced article categories: one editor might be prompted to find a source and resolve the problem. However, unsourced items cannot be allowed to remain in an article indefinitely. --Kudpung (talk) 16:32, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- Reference the above about the removed content concerning the Government rejecting Cublington over Founess for the 3rd London airport. The following extract from the Environment Magazine April 1973 reprinted with permission by Walt Patterson a respected commentator on environmental matters provides the citation to back up the statement. see Tmol42 (talk) 17:52, 30 June 2009 (UTC)