Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2563ec9ae23452a

Jump to content

Talk:Ctenitis squamigera

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Biology II 55174

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 12 January 2026 and 8 May 2026. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): ElisshaRaquino (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Ellie Skye, Biology Student 123.

— Assignment last updated by Eboyle23 (talk) 05:55, 11 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Peer-review Ellie Skye

[edit]

Wikipedia's Ctenitis squamigera entry is quite succinct and contains all of the necessary information about this fern in Hawai'i. Indeed, it states that the Hawaiian treefern is critically endangered, providing relevant information regarding the size of its population (no more than 200 individuals). Moreover, it explains the threats faced by the plant, including competition from invasive animals (pigs, goats, deer), and invasive flora. Nevertheless, the article is too brief and fails to include some biological information concerning the morphology, reproduction, and function of the fern.

Regarding the structure and credibility of the article, one can easily say that it needs improvement in several aspects. Firstly, this piece of writing lacks the necessary structure because it is missing "Description," "Habitat," and "Ecology" sections. Secondly, there are only a few citations used throughout the paper to verify some of the facts mentioned there. Thirdly, the lack of any visuals makes the Wikipedia article less useful for identifying purposes. Overall, the content provided in this entry seems to be quite credible, yet insufficient for academic work. Ellie Skye (talk) 07:41, 6 April 2026 (UTC)Reply