Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a21d77ad0c644bc2

Jump to content

Talk:Crypteia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 8 months ago by ~2025-34413-48 in topic The first sentence is terrible and needs improvement

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 18 January 2021 and 24 April 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): History2112. Peer reviewers: EKGMachine, Katochis.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:44, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Comments

[edit]

Why is this article found in Category:Ancient Greek titles? Itai (talk) 19:04, 15 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Krypteria

[edit]

Krypteria redirects here. What about the musical project (de:Krypteria)?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.234.44.170 (talkcontribs) 23:59, 4 May 2006

So write it - there, and include a dab header. Septentrionalis 20:40, 5 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Very Good

[edit]

It's very, very good that this info is here!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.224.228.218 (talkcontribs) 05:36, 17 September 2006

Wallon

[edit]

Could you please give a full reference for the Wallon citation. Thanks. Twospoonfuls 09:03, 11 March 2007 (UTC) Agreed, came here to post this —Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.229.201.180 (talk) 22:33, 3 February 2010 (UTC)Reply


After some quick online searching, I believe the reference is to Henri Wallon Explication d'un passage de Plutarque sur une loi de Lycurgue nommée la Cryptie (fragment d'une Histoire des Institutions politiques de la Grèce) (1850) according to this website dedicated to Wallon: http://www.henriwallon.com/Ecrits_de_Henri_Wallon/BD/DW%20B03%20D07plus.htm
Use Google Translate to get a gist of it if you don't speak French (I don't).
The book is also available as a scan (in French) from HathiTrust Digital Library: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/nnc1.cu01991353
Mojowiha (talk) 14:05, 13 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Koechly

[edit]

'Others (Koechly, Wachsmuth) believe it to be a military training, similar to the Athenian ephebia. Jeanmaire points out that that this bushranger life has no common point with the disciplined and well-ordered communal life (see homonoia) of the Spartan hoplite;' this seems to me to miss the point. the crypteia was used to test and train future leaders who be operarating outside the phalanx ( at least in politics ). 217.7.209.108 10:34, 15 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Modern sources?

[edit]

I'm a bit concerned about the Koechly (1835), Wachsmuth (1844) and Wallon (1850) sources. Are they still valid and recognised or (as with much 19th century history) more interesting in a historiographic context?

Mojowiha (talk) 14:19, 13 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

The first sentence is terrible and needs improvement

[edit]

This is an awkward and confusing sentence, which is not a good way to start an article:

"The kryptai either principally sought out and killed helots across Laconia and Messenia as part of a policy of terrorising and intimidating the enslaved population, or they principally did a form of military training, or they principally endured hardships as an initiation ordeal, or the Crypteia served a combination of all these purposes, possibly varying over time.[1]."

Please attempt to diagram that sentence, grammatically.

Please attempt merely read it and learn what the volunteer editors claim to know or be informing our readers.

It seems to communicate:

  1. We don't know;
  2. It might have been three or more things;
  3. or a combination, at the same time, or changing over time; but
  4. each separate activity was allegedly according to us (impossibly) their *principal* occupation.

Huh? ~2025-34413-48 (talk) 01:46, 18 November 2025 (UTC)Reply