Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2506b60db98f689

Jump to content

Talk:Crumber

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 11 years ago by 75.165.124.189 in topic (Comment)

(Comment)

[edit]

This article seems unencyclopedic. Should its content be moved content to Wiktionary? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blackeagle (talkcontribs) 01:37, 28 March 2006 (UTC)Reply


'Citation needed'? Can you reference a Google image search as a citation? There's basically no such thing as a modern non-metal crumber. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.165.124.189 (talk) 04:47, 31 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Operation/Construction

[edit]

The article doesn't describe at all how this thing works. Does it vaporise crumbs with a powerful laser? Or contain tiny frogs that like to eat crumbs? More seriously, just reading the article, I thought it was some kind of brush. Somebody should state the obvious.--ospalh (talk) 20:47, 16 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Questionable Crumber Information

[edit]

I am new to Wikipedia, joining because of my interest and experience in the Crumber. My Company manufactures the Table Crumber patented in 1941 and I personally have been involved with it for the last 25 years. There are other types of Crumbers which I am aware of that proceeded our design but in general, some of the information on this page does not appear correct. In particular the reference to Italian American restaurants and Crumbers beiing gifted to soldiers in WWII. Without a reference who is to say that it is or it isn't correct? I hate to make changes based solely on my experience, particularly because I am new to Wikipedia. Your thoughts.... RayMachine (talk) 17:11, 25 May 2010 (UTC)Reply