Talk:Crowding
Add topicLatest comment: 1 year ago by Paine Ellsworth in topic Requested move 26 May 2025
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Crowding redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
[edit]I was surprised that Wikipedia didn't have an article for this, so I've started one. Just the definition for now, but I'll add more to it later. RadioElectric (talk) 15:58, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
Requested move 26 May 2025
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 | It was proposed in this section that multiple pages be renamed and moved.
result: |
– No primary topic. See Macromolecular crowding, Crowding of the teeth, Crowd (disambiguation). 162 etc. (talk) 03:32, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
- Note: Visual crowding is an article with content and must also be dispositioned. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 05:55, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
- Are you proposing a disambiguation page at the base name after the move? Mdewman6 (talk) 04:12, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
- Either that or redirect to the existing Crowd (disambiguation), if consensus prefers. 162 etc. (talk) 05:03, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
- Support Crowding should be a redirect to Crowd (disambiguation) or become one itself. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 16:44, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
- Merge first: Crowding and Visual crowding describe the same phenomenon. Merging into Visual crowding, and then replacing Crowding with a dab (or redirect to dab), would avoid the need for moves. But the direction of the merge might also depend on which article would be less changed, and I'm not able to determine that. Jruderman (talk) 06:20, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
- I had missed that when I nominated this. It does appear that this is currently a WP:CFORK. Merge both articles at Visual crowding. 162 etc. (talk) 16:32, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.