Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22a3f61f99e89da

Jump to content

Talk:Craniotomy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 8 months ago by Ahilvert in topic WikiMed Course Peer Review
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Craniotomy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:07, 14 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Success

[edit]

What is the success rate, average 2601:549:4302:5BC0:4458:9E12:91A5:B5A5 (talk) 01:51, 24 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education assignment: WikiMed Fall 2025

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 27 October 2025 and 21 November 2025. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ahilvert (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by ChroakleyDingDong (talk) 16:07, 2 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

WikiMed Fall 2025 - Edit Plan

[edit]

Hello, I am a medical student who will be improving and revising the Craniotomy Wikipedia article for a WikiMed course.

I plan on making the following changes:

  1. Add an "Indications" section describing and elaborating on common indications for craniotomy
  2. Add an "Approaches" section describing and elaborating on common workhorse anatomical approaches for craniotomy, organized into "Supretentorial" and "Infratentorial" approaches, including Pterional, Bifrontal, Temporal, Retrosigmoid, and Suboccipital approaches.
  3. Improve the "Complications" section by organizing into Infection, Bleeding, Damage to surrounding structures, Loss of function/neurologic deficit, CSF leak, and Seizure/Meningeal irritation
  4. Add up-to-date secondary references (meta-analyses and systematic reviews)

Please let me know if you have any questions, concerns, or suggestions about these edits. Ahilvert (talk) 19:19, 5 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

WikiMed Course Peer Review

[edit]

The recent edits to this page by Ahilvert provide a lot of helpful new information, are balanced and neutral in tone. Key gaps in information have been filled without duplicating information provided elsewhere and the information is well organized, with topics covered in a logical and ordered fashion. I particularly like the bullet pointed lists for indications and approaches, this makes the information easy to read.

I think these edits are particularly helpful to help provide more detail on a very technical topic. In order to make these edits more accessible to a layperson I think simplifying the language where possible would be helpful. Alternatively you could add some definitions (either in text or via links) to help a layperson better understand the text. Example simplifications, could include changing ‘surgical access to the intracranial space’ to ‘surgical access to the space inside the skull’,  ‘neoplastic lesions’ to ‘tumor’, ‘neurovascular structures’ to ‘blood vessels and nerves’ etc. Other plain language terms could be used throughout e.g. ‘utilize’ switch to ‘use’ etc.

The list of approaches seems very complete (although I admit to not knowing what these all are!). I like that they are helpfully split into supratentorial and infratentorial approaches and that there are embedded links to explain these terms. I think it could be helpful to add a picture outlining where the supratentorial vs. infratentorial region is (the supratentorial wiki page already has a nice one). If possible it could also be helpful to add a diagram showing some of the approaches, as a layperson likely won’t understand what all the anatomic landmarks are, but a picture would provide a helpful point of reference, even if it’s just a labeled example of one specific approach. I am also wondering if a reference could be added for each approach, even if it is a review reference that just covers all the approaches.

Now these new sections have been added I think it would be helpful to add a summary sentence covering each section to the lead section to ensure this summarizes all the major points in the article. Lastly I think there is one section on the page where a single research study is described in detail. I think a helpful further edit could be summarizing the key points from this study and removing unnecessary information.

Overall these edits are very helpful and provide much more comprehensive coverage of craniotomy than was available previously. The content is relevant and up to date. The references are also all accurate, are written by a range of authors, and the links to the new references work appropriately. Hazel2128 (talk) 18:56, 14 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, Hazel2128 for this wonderful feedback. I have simplified the language slightly, added some Wikipedia page citations to assist with technical language, added summarizing sentences to each section, and added an image outlining where the supratentorial vs. infratentorial region is. Ahilvert (talk) 16:11, 20 November 2025 (UTC)Reply