Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22ef4255c3d2780

Jump to content

Talk:Cozonac

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Name

[edit]

Both names (cozonac and козунак) are valid. According to the Romanian etymological dictionary(definition of cozonac), the origin of the word is Greek (ϰοσωνάϰι or κοσωνάκι), the diminutive of ϰοσώνα/κοσώνα (meaning "doll"), due to the shape in which this cake is sometimes baked. If we were to follow the etymological principle, should we change the name of the article to Kοσωνάκι then? Mentatus (talk) 14:12, 14 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Picture

[edit]

По гнусен заводски козунак не можахте ли да снимате :)  Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.143.218.167 (talk) 14:25, 19 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Panettone/Roman occupation claim in Origins section

[edit]

The current text states that panettone's recipe "was shared and adapted in Eastern Europe following the Roman occupation." This claim is chronologically incoherent. Panettone is a Milanese pastry documented no earlier than the medieval or Renaissance period, centuries after the Roman occupation of the Balkans ended. The Roman occupation cannot have transmitted a recipe that did not yet exist. The sentence should either be rewritten to remove the causal link to Roman occupation, or removed entirely. A lot of the article is poorly written. I am sorry if I myself have contributed to this, I am still learning editing. The broader comparison between panettone and cozonac as structurally similar breads may be worth retaining, but only without the false historical framing. A source supporting the Roman occupation transmission claim is being requested. Trideeglass (talk) 00:58, 29 March 2026 (UTC)Reply