Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a21e53573913689d

Jump to content

Talk:Counterintuitive

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Bhugh in topic Stupid examples

Stupid examples

[edit]

This article is full of stupid examples. Does it have any value? Roger (talk) 06:09, 7 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

"That water vapor is lighter than air and is the reason clouds float and barometers work.[8]" The article footnoted, http://www.atmos.umd.edu/~stevenb/vapor/, is really interesting but says absolutely nothing about the relative density of water vapor vs air, what makes clouds float, or anything about how barometers work. Bhugh (talk) 07:12, 17 January 2018 (UTC)Reply


START ALL OVER.

"Nevertheless counter-intuitive concepts are psychologically more preferred than intuitive concepts[2] like in Von Restorff effect."

This is about as bad as it gets. Someone knowledgeable needs to start all over with this one. --Landrum Kelly Landrumkelly (talk) 17:48, 8 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thinking about it a little more I added a cleanup/re-write tag to the main article. It really does need to be re-thought from the start.

What might be most helpful is if we were able to find some actual published articles or the like that would give some structure and context to the whole idea of counterintuitive-ness. We need a better structure to hang the whole article on that just various random thoughts that a few wikipedia editors have had over the years. Bhugh (talk) 07:47, 18 January 2018 (UTC)Reply