Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a230fd938932e88e

Jump to content

Talk:Corey Brunish

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by 12.75.116.33

I'm fairly certain that this guy is the main contributor to his own article. I plugged the following IPs, which made most of the edits to this page, into GeoIP, and they are from....the places he lives. This seems really suspicious since this person is pretty not notable and the tone of the article is adulatory.

Here are the IPs: 98.113.134.181 108.6.136.108 2601:1C0:4400:B746:B5A2:3189:57B0:C31F 100.33.115.205 71.237.142.171 74.101.196.100

Additionally, all but one of the registered users only edits pages about...the Brunish family.  Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.120.162.235 (talk) 01:46, 25 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Pretty not notable? If you live in Portland you would know that the Brunish theater is one of the 5 theaters of the Portland 5 complex on Broadway next to the Arlene Schnitzer concert hall, etc. Brunish also owns properties in Portland such as retail buildings along Hawthorne like the Brunish Building at 3439 SE Hawthorne...not sure why it would be so strange for his publicist to update or validate info about him on a web platform such as this either, most of the other info on this site is easily verified from other platforms like the info on his Tony nods. What seems to be missing is any substantial information about his acting career.. it would be nice to see that updated! 12.75.116.33 (talk) 08:59, 18 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Recent edits need work, paragraphs have been reduced to what amounts to dot points.

[edit]

Recent edits have seen to turn almost the entire article into a poorly worded dot points list of achievements, actions and attributions. Recent edits by some users have destroyed the format and structure of paragraphs and appropriate prose and replaced with single dot points sentences of Date + Name + Action/attribution/achievement. I would like to ask that any further edits improve the readability of this article, in line with how Wikipedia articles should be and not continue to contribute to the mess that this has become. KarmaKangaroo (talk) 17:42, 21 April 2024 (UTC)Reply