Talk:Converium
Add topic | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
The result of this AfD discussion was keep. (aeropagitica) (talk) 16:55, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Converium logo.png
[edit]
Image:Converium logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
75% of citations on this article are dead
[edit]Is anyone concerned at all that 3 of the 4 citations being used to support this article are dead links? And the one working link points to a story that basically says that the company's CFO once spoke at a conference about how the company's client base was going down the tubes. This is the standard for a Wikipedia article about a defunct corporation? - Wacomshera (talk) 22:53, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
- Not sure what your specific questions are. If you want a literal answer, then "no", I am not concerned as some Wikipedia articles are littered with issues. This is why the project will never be finished and the encyclopedia continues to evolve. Anyone can edit and you are welcome to clean up the page as long as you adhere to guidelines and policies while doing so. There are also other remedies such as placing a tag to notify readers of issues or leaving a request for help. --CNMall41 (talk) 03:22, 20 April 2019 (UTC)