Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a454316b98cb51f9

Jump to content

Talk:Controversial Reddit communities

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Semi-protected edit request on 16 March 2026

[edit]

r/norske

r/norske is a Norwegian-language subreddit for discussion of matters related to Norway.[1] It was founded after the moderators of r/norge closed the subreddit down due to Reddit's restriction of API use. R/norske remained in use after r/norge updated. Since r/norske was lightly moderated, it has attracted right-wing and anti-immigration discussions. The community at /norske has been criticized for bigotry and racism.[2]

Sources [1] https://web.archive.org/web/20251125093259/https://www.reddit.com/r/norske/ [2]https://web.archive.org/web/20260210161755/https://www.morgenbladet.no/aktuelt/pa-reddit-er-norge-et-fritt-selvstendig-og-absolutt-delelig-rike/9620263 Elvertoooo (talk) 17:26, 16 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

 Not done. It's not clear that what the change you want to made. Thank you. Axbii (talk) 00:27, 20 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Just in case anyone wants to write r/TheRedPill or r/MensRights

[edit]

https://dspacemainprd01.lib.uwaterloo.ca/server/api/core/bitstreams/6d2efce1-e0ee-4c77-a98a-2c2fb667f8fc/content theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 01:07, 26 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

A doctoral thesis. The first word or phrase of content (in the "Abstract" section) is "TL;DR". It was indeed fun to know the author is in a "letting their hair down" sort of mood, although the paper's pretensions towards scholarship took a hit and I stopped right there. And while I'm at it... isn't the purpose of an "Abstract" section to SERVE as a "TL;DR"? Marcus Markup (talk) 01:50, 26 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
The very domain name in the URL made me suspect it's not a scholarly source. – Python Drink (talk) 01:47, 26 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
Perhaps see instead the author's published work, e.g. Cousineau, L. S. (2021). "A Positive Identity for Men"? Pathways to far-right participation through /r/MensRights and /r/TheRedPill. In Rise of the Far-Right: Technologies of Recruitment & Mobilization (pp. 127-146). Rowmen & Littlefield. https://uwaterloo.ca/scholar/l2cousin/publications/%E2%80%9C-positive-identity-men%E2%80%9D-pathways-far-right-participation-through-rmensrights
Wracking talk! 01:59, 26 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Page update request

[edit]

Reddit's 2005 wordmark is still seen on the page. Can you change it to the modern wordmark, which uses Reddit Sans rather than VAG Rounded? ~2026-29165-71 (talk) 14:14, 17 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

In the article, the phrase "gender ideology" links to the "transgender" page. It should simply link to "gender ideology", to match what the text says. ~2026-38329-29 (talk) 15:40, 5 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

I propose renaming the article to "Controversial subreddits"

[edit]

A subreddit IS a "reddit communitiy". If you don't know that, you would not be reading the article. And for those who have stumbled upon the article without knowing, that can be easily cured in the first sentence. "Reddit communities" is a definition, and does not belong in an article title. Marcus Markup (talk) 12:24, 19 August 2026 (UTC)Reply