Talk:Contra-rotating

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is supported by the aircraft engine task force.

question

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The article currently asserts "...resulting in the maximum power of a single piston or turboprop engine to drive two propellers..."

This is asserted, in the article in several places. The article doesn't try to explain why contra-rotating propellers result in more power. This should be explained. Geo Swan (talk) 03:23, 1 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

It is not that contra-rotating propellers result in more power, but that more power can be applied to an already size-limited propeller disk area. At the bottom of the article, see the external link Two Propellers in Tandem Turning in Opposite Ways Give Warplane New Speed. Kurt Artindagi (talk) 03:25, 24 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

Talk:Contra-rotating

question