Talk:Continuous obsolescence
Add topicLatest comment: 11 years ago by Vlad Patryshev in topic Is it an antipattern? Is it even a pattern?
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Starcraft ghost
[edit]
A casualty of this phenomenon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.76.252.185 (talk) 07:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
Is it an antipattern? Is it even a pattern?
[edit]What is this article about? The fact that some software survives many releases, and is being constantly rewritten? I think, this is the sign of success. Twitter did it, Facebook did it, Google did it. Is not it better than just throwing away the product and closing the company? Or I misunderstood something? The article is a puzzle to me. Vlad Patryshev (talk) 22:07, 2 September 2014 (UTC)