Talk:Continuity test
Add topicLatest comment: 16 years ago by Skbkekas in topic Please remove this
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
what about in math? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.3.16.1 (talk • contribs)
- There is not continuity test in the classical math since what the classical math discussed is certainty.(Yuanfangdelang (talk) 09:12, 25 September 2010 (Amercian Eastern Time))
Moved from main article:
"If someone could formally declare this article incomplete, or make it redirect to a search for 2 sections, the continuity test for mathematics (continuous and discontinuous functions) and this. Sorry I don't edit wikipedia often, I know a mod will see this real quick."
These are not my words. --marqmike2 (talk) 04:46, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
Please remove this
[edit]This article isn't ready for Wikipedia. Please remove it to your user page. (BTW, Wild and Seber's book on nonlinear regression has a lot on discontinuous regression.) Kiefer.Wolfowitz (talk) 03:39, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
- To clarify, it is the new material on statistical continuity testing in regression analysis that needs to be removed. The material on continuity testing in electronics should stay. Skbkekas (talk) 16:32, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
- I cannot understand why the continuity test (in Statistics/piecewise rengresison analysis) was deleted. This is a new concept in Statistics since a "discontinuity" is a random event that needs to be tested and inferred in a probability. (Yuanfangdelang (talk) 00:40, 1 February 2010 (UTC))
- This sounds like original research. Can you point to articles by at least two independent authors supporting this position? Skbkekas (talk) 04:53, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, this is an original research in Statistics, especially for the piecewise regression analysis. The other current methods use an arbitrary assumption of enforced continuity to establish the methods. However, the "continuity" or "discontinuity" is random and canont be assumed. I have a paper published in the JSM 2009 proceedings but so far have no any other independent author supporting this psition. However, I deeply believe that this new concept as well as the relevant methods will be widely discussed and finally accepted by the public since it follows the principles of Statistics. So, I wish we can reach an agreement to recover the part of contents for Statistics. Thanks very much.(Yuanfangdelang (talk) 09:04, 25 September 2010 (Amercian Eastern Time))