Talk:Consular tribune
Add topicLatest comment: 3 years ago by Ifly6 in topic Re recent reverts
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Needs more refs Suggestion
[edit]This article relies heavily on the a single work (Forsyth's) which is idiosyncratic in several viewpoints. It could use other sources, e.g., Cornell, Lintott. - Eponymous-Archon (talk) 02:57, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
Re recent reverts
[edit]I reverted some edits from an IP. This was for the following reasons.
- The paragraph with the incipit "Modern scholars" interjected into the Traditional account section is both duplication of the same paragraph I wrote later in Re-evaluation but also was done so without citing sources.
- Some paragraphs were written which were wholly unsourced while overwriting sourced material. The new version also was wrong: there were never two consular tribunes elected.
I also added some stuff from Lomas' 2018 book, which provides a decent handling of the topic from a modern perspective. Ifly6 (talk) 15:47, 29 August 2022 (UTC)